A battery explosion wiped out the data of 750,000 South Korean civil servants for seven years and paralyzed the public system. But there was no backup?

👤 nrvae@Eddie 📅 2026-09-10 00:55:24

A fire at the National Information Resources Institute (NIRS) Daejeon Data Center in South Korea paralyzed 647 government systems, and 750,000 civil servants' documents for seven years were destroyed, with only 15% recovered, highlighting gaps in backup and resilience.
(Preliminary information: South Korea's Naver is acquiring the Upbit crypto exchange! Can LINE be used to trade crypto assets and Korean won stablecoins in the future? )
(Background supplement: Will it be implemented in 2027? In-depth analysis of the capital game behind the "difficult birth" of the Korean won stablecoin)

Contents of this article

The explosion of a lithium battery directly paralyzed the Korean digital government. What can we learn from it? At the end of September, a fire broke out in the computer room of the National Information Resources Management Institute (NIRS) headquarters in Daejeon, 140 kilometers away from Seoul. The flames quickly engulfed the server cabinets, causing the shutdown of 647 government business systems and the permanent disappearance of 858TB of files accumulated by about 750,000 civil servants over seven years.

The fire caused the total loss of government files

It is understood that these documents were stored in a government system called G-Drive, where South Korean civil servants have been required to centralize their work files since 2018. Since the system has no external or offline backup, once the hardware is damaged, the files cannot be restored.

After the fire, government emails, legal databases, and Government24 services were all offline. The impact covered basic services such as personnel, taxation, police, and mobile digital identity. Even emergency response GPS tracking and postal banking operations were also affected. According to local reports, only 101 systems had been restored by October 1, a recovery rate of 15.6%.

The president apologized, pointing out that "there is no emergency plan at all"

On September 28, President Lee Jae-myung apologized to the nation, saying frankly that he was "deeply sorry." He also criticized the government for encountering a power grid failure in 2023 but failing to establish a feasible contingency plan. This disaster was "completely foreseeable but unprepared."

"It's not that the plan failed, but that there was no plan at all."

Secretary of the Ministry of Administrative and Security Kim Min-jae revealed that the government has selected a cloud service provider to move 96 damaged systems to the Daegu branch center, hoping to restart them within a month. However, in addition to hardware reconstruction, what is even more troublesome is the lack of external backup of seven-year official files, which creates long-term risks for daily administration, policy tracking and judicial audit.

Decentralized storage: eradicating the risk of "single point of failure"

The root cause of this disaster lies in the "centralized storage" of data. Since the platform (G-Drive) has no external backup, all data stored on it has been lost.

It does not mean that you must use blockchain technology, but you really should learn the importance of distributed storage to ensure that when any one or several nodes (i.e. data centers) are destroyed due to fire, terrorist attack or any reason, the impact on the integrity and availability of the entire data network can be controlled to a minimum and the risk of "single point of failure" is eradicated.

South Korea’s painful lesson reminds policymakers: digital efficiency is important, but resilience is the last line of defense to preserve national memory and public services.

Label:
share:
FB X YT IG
nrvae@Eddie

nrvae@Eddie

Blockchain and cryptoassets editor, focusing onanalyzeDomain content analysis and insights

Comment (10)

Oberon 65days ago
Decentralization often comes at the expense of efficiency, which the article underestimates.
Jagger 65days ago
Blockchain is not just about currency speculation, the author grasps the essence.
Lydia 65days ago
How does DAO make decisions and vote?
Kellan 65days ago
You’re right, user experience determines ultimate adoption.
Howard 65days ago
At present, the development logic of the industry is gradually becoming clearer.
Mary 65days ago
Layer2 solutions are indeed increasingly important.
Adelaide 65days ago
Identity, identity on the chain will be more important in the future.
Ava 66days ago
The current pace of industry development is accelerating.
Esme 66days ago
Ecological prosperity is more important than a single technological breakthrough.
Violet 87days ago
There will be more innovative protocols emerging in the future.

Add comment

Popular content